MadMarx hat geschrieben:bei all diesen kurven, die ich letzten tage sah, vermisse ich einen echten ausdruck eines leistungsprüfstands, mit luftdruck, ansaugtemperatur, usw, usw....hier sieht man nur excel-graphen, die letztlich wenig aussagen.
oh for goodness sakes Marx!!!
That was no EXCEL GRAPH.
I made it perfectly clear these were Simulator. unfortunately for you my simulator is uncannily accurate, as I know all the different variables in detail and by heart to an extent you will never do.
For me it's a useful tool, and each tool is like cave ape times...it saves me time.
If you have bad tools go back to the caves.I don't have time for your stupid criticisms.
FYI:-
I also happen to have built and tested the head and some of the engines I supply figures for.
Have you ever designed anything in you life?
Have you ever got your hands dirty actually doing the HARD WORK modifying a critical engine component and redesigning it from scratch?
I mean, ffs (!) I actually am involved with some PROPER companies that have PROPER facilities and have been involved in lots of PROPER motorsport over the years,including some of the most successful Ford and Opel (cos XE) engines out there.
One of them actually supplies me all sorts of bits, including theV64V cams for my Jaguar engine. They know the difference between a LCA of 105 and 107 degrees and don't question why I am specifying that.
Your kind of engine "tuners" I meet every day of the week but sure as f...k they would never be competent enough to work for Cosworth, and all they can do is order crap stuff from JE and say it's "designed".
Isn't that what cambridge motorsport set out to do.
Supply cheap crap JE pistons for legacy engines which would never melt them because they would never even make 100bhp/L.
Damn it! I actually MAKE piston forgings.
What do you know?
Do you know what is the difference between extruded seed alloy and casting seed alloy? Wossner and why they go for cheaper mahle forgings....venolia, mondiale, Omega, and the defunct Doncaster stuff?
What is RR59?
Do you have any idea what is involved in the manufacturing and testing process,in order to be able to back up data, not with BS but with stuff which is repeatable time after time after time, until people start copying your stuff because they know it works??
Are you aware what is involved in designing and making say a successful exhaust valve shape?
Maybe an exhaust primary length, and why?
Can you kindly tell me what reprinting your power graph ACTUALLY DOES?
It's a 4 cylinder carburettor engine in a 6 cylinder thread.
This should already make you hesitate a little before you bore us yet again with the tractor engine details...BUT NO, Marx and his best mate Kaka know best.
They will always throw crap on anything I say, because they don't believe a word of doing things properly with proper engineering or proper craftsmanship going right back to Coventry climax or Duckworth in the UK.
I mean the bore/stroke ratio are not even in the same league, neither is the valve area (heavily restricted even on the heavily exaggerated 200 Bhp TR4 engines everyone and their dog are claiming to make from that heap of crap)
WTF is this supposed to mean, apart from I doubt whether you have ever worked on a modified TR6 in your life. never mind a proper 4v engine?? :boese: